Here are some factoids I gleaned from my readings:
- Newspaper staffs are down by roughly 30 percent from ten years earlier. For network news, the cuts have been even steeper.
- Traditional online news sites have gotten bigger, not smaller, despite the proliferation of online news outlets.
- When changes in communicating to the masses have occurred in the past, existing power elites have tried to exploit the transition in almost every case.
- The argument culture limits the information we get, rather than broadening it.
The fundamental premise of the book is that the objective-and-disciplined mediation function has largely disappeared from news reporting. In parallel, business models have arisen that focus more on assertion (goal: disseminate information quickly) and affirmation (goal: maintain audience loyalty) than on verification. As such, the burden of editing and analyzing the news falls to individuals. In essence, we must become our own investigative journalists.
The authors point out that the clash between fact-and-faith has occurred numerous times in history, providing both risks and opportunities in every case. In this instance, the challenge of “skeptically knowing” the truth about the news is indeed burdensome, but we can now interact with the media, political leaders, and others in an unprecedented manner.
Powerful stuff, if you think about it.
- Blur: Who is Who in Journalism? (teesdiary.wordpress.com)